🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of nations are exploring comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that phones and networks are "taking away our children's youth". A law is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to pass a bill lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid first step," commented one parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong research".

Earlier, interest built behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after encountering harmful social media material suggests that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to build tools that are safe and suitable for children," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, legislation is primarily occurring at the local government level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional access needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced bills requiring guardian approval for under-16s to open social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from certain individuals to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Outside of the West, further states are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations take a more nuanced position. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this international discussion continues, the policies of the Australian government and its followers indicate that governments globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.